- Why Is It Dark at Night?
- Give a Counterexample
- See the Forest beyond the Trees
- A Combination Of Properties
- How The Rainforests Are Drying Out?
- Geographic Mysteries And Their Scientific Explanations
- A Cockroach Life
- You Reap What You Sow: Why Do We Assume the World Is Fair?
- How Evidence-Based Medicine Works
- Ubiquitous Teeth
- How to build a skyscraper
- BOOKS: FROM AN IDEA OF BOOKSHELF
- How Does a Black Box Work?
- How to Become a Space Tourist
Topic Last Updated on 16-07-2024
Behind Closed Doors
The conviction that people always get the things they deserve in accordance with their actions and personal qualities is a cognitive bias called the just-world fallacy. The first person to bring attention to this phenomenon was Melvin J. Lerner.
Melvin J. Lerner was a psychologist and, as part of his clinical training, he observed how people with mental disorders were treated in mental health facilities. Lerner personally knew the medical professionals who worked there, and they were kind and educated individuals. That’s why he was very surprised when he overheard them judging their patients behind closed doors, saying that the patients were to blame for their own suffering. Lerner speculated that by shifting the responsibility for the disorder to the patient, the healthcare workers protected their own psyches. After all, working in a psychiatric hospital wasn’t easy — the doctors had to reconcile themselves with the fact that some of their patients’ problems were incurable.
Once, Lerner overheard university students disparaging poor people, claiming that they were responsible for their own misfortunes. The students held that poor people were probably just lazy and didn’t try to do anything to improve their circumstances. However, these students didn’t consider arguments regarding basic inequality and other uncontrollable forces. For example, children from poor families have fewer opportunities to learn foreign languages, engage in extracurricular activities, or go to private schools. This means that, as a rule, it’s much harder for them to gain the skills that would help them get high-paying jobs in the future, as opposed to their peers from wealthier families.
Such experiences with his colleagues and students perplexed Lerner as they couldn’t be explained by the psychological theories that existed at the time. That’s when the psychologist set out to investigate this phenomenon himself.
Do You Get What You Deserve?
In 1966, Melvin J. Lerner and his colleague Carolyn Simmons conducted an experiment for which they recruited 72 participants. The research subjects, seated in a separate room, had to observe a woman through a special window (you’ve probably seen such rooms with one-way mirrors in movies — they are usually used in police interrogations). The woman was solving mathematical problems. The observers were told that she could neither hear nor see them and that, for every wrong answer, she’d receive an electric shock. In reality, the woman was an actress: she made mistakes on purpose and pretended as though she was in pain from the electric shock. The participants were concerned about the woman’s distress, but they couldn’t influence the events they were observing.
Lerner’s Experiment and the Psychological Mechanism Behind the Just World Fallacy
After a while, Lerner asked the participants to describe the woman, and their portrayals were overwhelmingly deprecating. They criticized her appearance and personality and even said she deserved the treatment she received — even though they were seeing her for the first time! The more the actress “suffered,” the more negative the observers’ descriptions of her became. Lerner proposed a new theory, according to which reactions like these help observers protect their own minds by maintaining belief in the existence of a just world.
According to this logic, the woman suffered for a reason — because she was a bad person. In a different version of the experiment, the research subjects were told that the woman would receive compensation for the discomfort to which she was subjected during the study. In this case, she was described more positively and with fewer criticisms. The participants subconsciously believed that since the woman received compensation, she’d be rewarded for her suffering like any good person — and thus justice would be restored.
An Allowance for Karma
In the 1970s, scientists from different countries joined forces to research the just-world belief phenomenon. They studied how observers reacted to and described victims of traffic accidents and violence, as well as unemployed, poor, and disabled individuals. It turned out that people around the world who were forced to witness the suffering of others tended to blame the victim.
In 1975, psychologists Zick Rubin and Letitia Anne Peplau developed the Just World Scale — a questionnaire in which respondents had to agree or disagree with twenty statements, in addition to providing personal information and beliefs. The results showed the following correlation: the more people believed in a just world, the worse their attitudes were towards those who were poor, discriminated against, or suffering from social injustice. Generally, people who believed in a just world tended to be more conservative, authoritarian, and religious.
These people often live under severe restrictions and rigid hierarchies, and their belief in a just world helps them cope with these conditions. In their view, it is only natural that they’d be rewarded for their patience and sacrifices while everyone else would be punished. It is as though the universe has a myriad of watching eyes that gather information about all the virtuous and evil deeds in the world and special mathematical formulas for calculating the respective rewards and punishments in accordance with previously documented rules, as well as an entire staff that makes sure everyone gets what they deserve. How would you ensure absolute justice otherwise?
Rubin’s and Peplau’s Just World Scale
For every statement below, assign a number from 1 to 6 depending on how strongly you agree with it. 1 means that you absolutely disagree with the statement, and 6 means you absolutely agree.
- I’ve found that a person rarely deserves the reputation they have. (U)
- Basically, the world is a just place. (J)
- People who get “lucky breaks” have usually earned their good fortune. (J)
- Careful drivers are just as likely to get hurt in traffic accidents as careless ones. (U)
- It is a common occurrence for a guilty person to get off free in courts. (U)
- Students almost always deserve the grades they receive in school. (J)
- People who keep in shape have little chance of suffering a heart attack. (J)
- The political candidate who sticks up for their principles rarely gets elected. (U)
- It is rare for an innocent person to be wrongly sent to jail. (J)
- In professional sports, many fouls and infractions never get called by the referee. (U)
- By and large, people deserve what they get. (J)
- When parents punish their children, it is almost always for good reasons. (J)
Measuring Belief in a Just World
13. Good deeds often go unnoticed and unrewarded. (U)
14. Although evil men may hold political power for a while, in the general course of history, good wins out. (J)
15. In almost any business or profession, people who do their jobs well rise to the top. (J)
16. Parents tend to overlook the things to be admired in their children. (U)
17. It is often impossible for a person to receive a fair trial. (U)
18. People who experience misfortune have often brought it upon themselves. (J)
19. Crime doesn’t pay. (J)
20. Many people suffer through absolutely no fault of their own. (U)
Calculate your total score for the answers marked with the letter U. Then, calculate your score for answers marked with J the same way. If you have more J answers, you believe in a just world. If, however, you scored higher on the questions marked with U, you see the world as unjust. You may also judge how strongly you agree that virtues are always followed by a reward (Question 3), evil acts are punished (Question 12), and that bad people are often rewarded (Question 5).
