- Frozen Man
- Bullet Journal
- The Physics Of Surfing
- Why Do Traffic Signs Look The Way They Do?
- Pi Number
- The Shape of Water
- Where did the meteorites go?
- Why It’s So Hard to Go against the Grain?
- Why Every City Has Its Own Climate?
- Instant Noodles
- The Coming Renaissance
- Paracelsus: Alchemy to the Aid of Medicine
- History of Coins
- Why do waterfalls retreat?
Topic Last Updated on 10-07-2024
Post on topic: Majority Influence.
Legendary Foolishness
Till Eulenspiegel is the protagonist of many medieval Dutch and German legends, a vagrant and trickster. In one such tale, Till presents himself as a painter and, for a substantial reward, says that he will depict a Count surrounded by his fellow noblemen. The Count promises to execute the hero if he in any way distorts reality, while the noblemen threaten to kill him if he doesn’t make them look good.
Of course, the jolly Eulenspiegel isn’t fond of either option. Instead, he decides to cheat — he spends all the time he is supposed to be working by going to feasts and parties, enjoying the Count’s luxurious castle. On the appointed day, Till gathers all the tale’s heroes together to show them his creation. He points at a blank wall and declares that it contains a magical painting that can only be seen by legitimate members of the noble bloodline.
The Count’s Jester and the Vanishing Trick
Everyone pretends as though they can see the painting perfectly well, and they begin to discuss their portraits. In reality, however, the Count and his company only see a whitewashed wall and are very upset about it. Only the Count’s jester, habitually regarded as a fool by society, frankly admits that he sees no painting at all. Still, Eulenspiegel manages to disappear together with the money he’d been paid by the Count.
A similar storyline is at the center of a fairytale by the Danish author Hans Christian Andersen, “The Emperor’s New Clothes.” In it, a monarch walks around naked, but everyone around him pretends to admire his new outfit, which apparently is invisible only to fools. The lie is uncovered by a child, who shouts, “But the Emperor doesn’t have anything on at all!” At last, the crowd picks up on the child’s words, while the now-exposed Emperor continues with his procession.
Both stories illustrate a common occurrence: no one actually believes the lies of impostors, but they keep silent due to their fear of being mocked. This leads to a paradoxical situation: everyone is confused about what’s going on but at the same time supports the shared delusion. This phenomenon is called pluralistic ignorance.
Majority Influence | Be Like Everybody Else
The desire to align with the majority was handed down to us by our ancestors. In the past, it wasn’t easy to survive on your own. Therefore, you had to find food and protect yourself against bad weather, your enemies, and wild animals together with your kinfolk. To this day, in educational institutions, interest groups, or the workplace, it is common to follow unspoken rules: keep close to the group, maintain team spirit, and try not to get into fights. Of course, following these rules is justified, since starting conflicts and sabotaging your work won’t do any good. Sometimes, though, we choose the wrong course of action just because everyone around us is doing it.
Solomon Asch’s Conformity Experiments
In the 1950s, psychologist Solomon Asch conducted a series of experiments on a group of eight students. They were introduced to each other as randomly-selected volunteers, but, in reality, seven of them were Asch’s research assistants. Everyone received two cards. One card had a single line; the other card had three lines, one of which was the same length as the line on the first card while the remaining two lines were considerably longer or shorter. The participants were asked to say aloud which of the lines matched.
They were seated in such a way that members of the “fake” group responded first, followed by the real subjects. It turned out that, if the correct answer was first given, then the real participant also went with the right option. When, however, all of Asch’s assistants, one after the other, confidently gave the wrong answer, the participants conformed to their choices. In a series of 12 experiments, 75 % of research subjects changed their answer to the wrong option after hearing the responses of others. In other versions of the experiment, Asch found that the more members of the group gave the wrong answer, the more frequently the “naïve” participants went along with it.
Majority | Implied Consent
A person needs to follow the crowd. Since ancient times, isolation and banishment from communities of our fellow tribespeople have been used as punishment for serious transgressions.
You may recall heroes of movies and books who had to overcome loneliness or even bullying from members of their groups who didn’t accept them. It isn’t surprising then that we often misinterpret the position of the majority — just like in the stories about the naked Emperor or the trickster Eulenspiegel, in which everyone in the crowd incorrectly “read” each other’s thoughts.
German political scientist Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann proposed the spiral of silence theory to explain why certain groups choose to remain silent while others actively declare their opinions. People who are confident that their stance is common are more likely to voice it in public. Those who see their beliefs as less popular will take a more moderate position in their public utterances — or they won’t say anything at all. According to Noelle-Neumann’s theory, the silent people are governed by a fear of punishment or isolation. That’s how we get societal beliefs that don’t account for the views of many people. Politicians, journalists, and opinion leaders can broadcast their ideas to large audiences, making everyone believe that they’re right.
